翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Scheinberg
・ United States v. Schoon
・ United States v. Schooner Peggy
・ United States v. Schooner Sally
・ United States v. Schwimmer
・ United States v. Screws
・ United States v. Seale
・ United States v. Seeger
・ United States v. Segui
・ United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.
・ United States v. Shabani
・ United States v. Shi
・ United States v. Shipp
・ United States v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians
・ United States v. Shynkarenko
United States v. Simms
・ United States v. Singer Mfg. Co.
・ United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians
・ United States v. Smith
・ United States v. Snider
・ United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
・ United States v. Solon
・ United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n
・ United States v. Southwestern Cable Co.
・ United States v. Spearin
・ United States v. Sprague
・ United States v. Spy Factory, Inc.
・ United States v. Stanley
・ United States v. Steever
・ United States v. Stevens


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Simms : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Simms

''United States v. Simms'', , was a United States Supreme Court case. It was one of a series of cases dealing with the applicability of previous laws in the newly created District of Columbia.
== Background ==
Prior to the creation of the District of Columbia in 1801, Virginia created a private right of action to enforce most of its criminal statutes. It was illegal in Virginia to operate a billiards parlor, a faro table, or any of a number of other gambling operations from one's house. The law provided that the penalty would be a fine of 150 pounds payable to ''any'' party that would file suit against the operator.
When the District of Columbia was formed the acts of Congress that created the district, also created a contradictory legal situation. They held that within the portion of the District of Columbia that had previously been Virginia territory the laws of Virginia would continue to apply. However, it also held that all suits for breach of the peace or other laws within the district must be prosecuted in the name of the United States and that fines would be payable to the United States.〔 This led to a contradiction because the Virginia law, which was supposedly still in force, had no such requirement.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Simms」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.